THE WORLD IS NOT STANDING STILL.RSS
BIG CHANGE.
BIG CHANGE, one tap away
BIG CHANGE, one tap away

Make room for the big picture.

Add BIG CHANGE to your home screen or desktop. It opens in its own window, with the latest stories when you’re online.

iPhone & iPad
Open bigchange.ai in Safari. Tap Share, then Add to Home Screen. Turn on Open as Web App if shown, then tap Add.
Android
Open bigchange.ai in Chrome. In the browser menu, choose Install app or Add to Home screen.
Desktop
In Chrome or Edge, use the install icon in the address bar or the browser’s app menu. In Safari on Mac, choose File → Add to Dock.

Markdown edition

# Study examines chatbot advice on digital abuse

> Researchers assessed older chatbot answers.

By BIGCHANGE.AI Editorial

Published: 2026-10-31T08:06:38.260Z
Updated: 2026-10-31T08:06:38.260Z
Canonical: https://bigchange.ai/blog/chatbot-advice-digital-abuse-study

![AI-generated conceptual illustration of a blank-screen phone beside an open blank notebook](https://bigchange.ai/api/media/file/blank-phone-notebook.png)
AI-generated conceptual illustration by BIG CHANGE

An August 2026 [USENIX study](https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity26/presentation/prakash), highlighted by [NYU on October 20](https://engineering.nyu.edu/news/ai-chatbots-often-give-unsafe-or-incomplete-advice-survivors-tech-enabled-abuse-study-finds), examined chatbot advice about technology-facilitated abuse.

## The big change

- Answers can omit safety context.
- Perception differs from expert assessment.
- Older results cannot establish current performance.

## What researchers found

Experts assessed single-turn answers to public-source questions; GPT and Claude received safety-centered prompts. Of 268 answers, 86% were imperfect in at least one of accuracy, completeness or safety—not necessarily unsafe. The sample included 139 GPT-4o (`gpt-4o-2024-08-06`) answers and 43 each from Claude 3.7 Sonnet (`claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219`), Ruth and Aimee. Missing warnings mattered: a change could alert an abuser.

Separately, 114 self-reported survivors rated perceived confidence and difficulty. Some feared escalation; their sample cannot represent all survivors. BIG CHANGE did not test the systems.

### Sources & further reading

[USENIX paper](https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/usenixsecurity26/sec26_prepub_prakash.pdf): methods; [NYU](https://engineering.nyu.edu/news/ai-chatbots-often-give-unsafe-or-incomplete-advice-survivors-tech-enabled-abuse-study-finds): same study.

## Sources

- [USENIX Security paper](https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/usenixsecurity26/sec26_prepub_prakash.pdf) — Research methods, results and limitations.
- [NYU Tandon summary](https://engineering.nyu.edu/news/ai-chatbots-often-give-unsafe-or-incomplete-advice-survivors-tech-enabled-abuse-study-finds) — October 20 account of the same study.