# Meta introduces Muse Ember
> A model for repeated agent work.
By BIGCHANGE.AI Editorial
Published: 2026-11-10T02:29:38.024Z
Updated: 2026-11-10T02:29:38.024Z
Canonical: https://bigchange.ai/blog/meta-muse-ember-agent-model-pricing

AI-generated illustration for BIG CHANGE
Meta introduced [Muse Ember](https://research.meta.ai/blog/muse-ember) on November 9 for repeated agent tasks; it is available through Meta Model API and Muse Code.
## The big change
- **The change:** A smaller model joins Meta’s lineup.
- **Why it matters:** Small charges accumulate across many agent steps.
- **What to watch:** Token prices alone do not establish cost per successful task.
## Understanding the bill
Developers must decide where to delegate and check results before acting.
According to [Meta’s pricing documentation](https://dev.meta.ai/docs/pricing-rate-limits), prompts up to 200,000 input tokens cost $0.10 per million input, $0.004 cached input and $0.50 output. Above 200,000, the respective rates are $0.30, $0.012 and $1.50. Cached tokens count toward the threshold; the higher tier applies to the entire request.
At the lower tier, one million uncached input tokens across qualifying requests plus 100,000 output tokens cost $0.15 in model tokens. Retries and tool use can increase the final bill.
## What an independent test measures
[Vals AI](https://www.vals.ai/models/meta_muse-ember) reported 60.48% for Ember on its Vals Index at maximum reasoning and about $0.15 per test in its November 9 release note. Its [methodology](https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index) combines finance, coding, legal and tax benchmarks weighted by US economic output. The finance component includes multi-step financial reasoning and spreadsheet modeling; other components cover different kinds of work. The aggregate describes selected tests, not the accuracy of a particular business workflow.
The Vals test cost and token bundle measure different things. Teams can test representative inputs, failure rates and complete costs before deciding which actions to delegate. BIG CHANGE has not tested Ember.
## Sources
- [Introducing Our Smallest, Most Efficient Model: Muse Ember](https://research.meta.ai/blog/muse-ember) — Meta announces the model and describes evaluation conditions and pricing.
- [Meta Model API pricing](https://dev.meta.ai/docs/pricing-rate-limits) — Meta explains token rates and request billing.
- [Muse Ember benchmarks and cost](https://www.vals.ai/models/meta_muse-ember) — Vals reports its own test results at maximum reasoning.
- [Vals Index methodology](https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/vals_index) — Vals explains the sector-weighted benchmark composition.
The BIG CHANGE newsletter
The big picture. At your pace.
Recent stories on AI and robotics, the shifts worth watching and practical ideas to use. Choose a daily briefing, weekly digest or monthly perspective.
Next scheduled send (UTC): . Your first edition arrives at the next scheduled send after you confirm.
Your privacy, your choice.
Necessary storage supports site security and remembers your choices. Optional Google Analytics stays off until you allow it. You can read every story with necessary storage only. Privacy details