# UserSWE tests coding agents in conversations
> UserSWE shows how turn budgets alter coding-agent rankings.
By BIGCHANGE.AI Editorial
Published: 2026-10-25T14:14:38.541Z
Updated: 2026-10-25T14:14:38.541Z
Canonical: https://bigchange.ai/blog/userswe-coding-agent-dynamic-user-evaluation

AI-generated conceptual illustration by BIG CHANGE.
[UserSWE](https://arxiv.org/html/2610.29822v1) is an October 21 preprint testing 11 coding agents on 72 repository tasks with simulated users.
## The big change
- **What changed:** The user’s clarity and proposed cause can change across turns.
- **How it works:** Each turn triggers tests and cross-family verdict review.
- **Why it matters:** The leader changes with the exchange budget.
## What the score captures
A fixed pool constrains disclosure. Messages react to the agent and tests; a persona chain calibrated on 20,859 private sessions shapes their wording. The users were simulated.
Claude Fable 5.1 leads at one turn (31.9%); GPT-6-Astra at eight (81.9%), one task above Claude Opus 5. Opus leads on the score that rewards faster completion. Different scaffolds complicate model-only comparisons. The authors promise a benchmark and framework release; v1 links none. Tasks cover one or two issues.
## Sources
- [UserSWE preprint v1 (2026)](https://arxiv.org/html/2610.29822v1) — Author-run preprint.
The BIG CHANGE newsletter
The big picture. At your pace.
Recent stories on AI and robotics, the shifts worth watching and practical ideas to use. Choose a daily briefing, weekly digest or monthly perspective.
Next scheduled send (UTC): . Your first edition arrives at the next scheduled send after you confirm.
Your privacy, your choice.
Necessary storage supports site security and remembers your choices. Optional Google Analytics stays off until you allow it. You can read every story with necessary storage only. Privacy details